Politicians and Sex
Opinion Editorial by John Stossel -
Mar 19, 2008
31 ratings from readers
The Spitzer scandal illustrates an unfortunate principle: American criminal laws are often less about actually protecting us from harm than about giving the illusion that politicians are protecting us from harm.
When New York Gov. Eliot
Spitzer was caught using a prostitution service, the irony was that he was a
tough-on-prostitution politician.
He took pride in locking up the
same kind of people he is said to have done $80,000 worth of business with. He
supported “tougher laws” to imprison customers like him.
In his statement to the news
media, Spitzer called the scandal a “private matter.”
Good point. Adults’
paying for sex ought to be a private matter, but when Spitzer was attorney
general, he didn’t consider paid sex private. He’s one of many politicians who
were eager to punish others for doing what he did.
What’s going on here? Maybe
these men want to punish others for acting on the same forbidden impulses they
know they can’t control themselves?
Rep. Mark Foley of Florida was
a big advocate of punishing any adult who had sex with minors. “They’re sick
people; they need mental health counseling,” he shouted.
But then ABC News caught Foley
sending sexual instant messages to minors.
Politicians should cut back on
their grandstanding, says Arizona public defender Chris Phillis, because while
it’s bad enough to call what consenting adults do “sex crimes,” it’s even worse
to criminalize kids who do what kids have always done.
Phillis, who defends teens
accused of sex crimes, says common sexual experimentation is now prosecuted. “If
a 15-year-old touches a 13-year-old, touches their breasts, they are now guilty
of a felony crime. And I would love to tell you that 13-year-olds aren’t
engaging in this conduct. I have a 13-year-old. But telling you that isn’t
going to change the fact.”
The Centers for Disease Control
reports that 25 percent of America’s 15-year-olds say they’ve have had sex.
Nearly 40 percent of 16-year-olds and almost half the 17-year-olds say they
have.
All are under Arizona’s age of
consent, which prompted Senate committee chairwoman Karen Johnson to try to
change Arizona’s sex-offender laws. She wanted to give kids a break.
But the political winds are not
on her side. Few politicians want to spend political capital weakening
sex-crime laws — even when such laws have horrendous unintended consequences.
Arizona’s Speaker of the House
Jim Weiers defends Arizona’s tough laws, saying that if you are a sex offender,
“Arizona is becoming very quickly known as a state you don’t want to stay in.”
But Weiers acknowledges that Arizona’s sex-offender registry has 15,000 names
on it.
I asked him how putting young
people who engaged in noncoercive sex play on Arizona’s registry protects the
public. “I don’t know if it does. ... You can’t take each and every individual...”
But it is individuals whose
lives are wrecked by these laws. When Garrett Daley was 14, his 9-year-old
adopted sister, Devon, said he molested her. Their mom called the police.
It turned out Devon had lied.
It was she who initiated sex with Garrett. She later told the police, but they
didn’t believe her. Today, seven years later, prosecutors still won’t let her
change her testimony.
To avoid a jail sentence,
Garrett plea-bargained to “attempted molestation of a child.” What choice do
these kids have?
“They’re told they’ll go to
jail for 90 years or 50 years or something, unless they accept this plea, and
the plea almost always requires lifetime sex-offender registry,” Sen. Johnson
says.
Garrett didn’t realize his plea
bargain would put him in a different kind of jail. Once you’re on the sex
offender registry or on probation, your life is wrecked, public defender
Phillis told “20/20.”
“They can’t go anywhere
children frequent. So that’s McDonald’s, that’s Jack in the Box ... Children
have actually been told if you go to a movie and another child walks in, even
if it’s a rated R movie, then you’re to get up and leave.”
I told Weiers about the public
defender’s comments. “The public defenders say all laws go too far,” Weirs
replied.
Give me a break. State
sex-offender registries could separate consensual teen sex from pedophiles who
prey on 5-year-olds. Minnesota does that.
Too often, American criminal law is a blunt instrument
designed to make it look as if politicians are protecting us. I think the
politicians usually protect themselves, at our expense.
John
Stossel is co-anchor of ABC News’ “20/20” and the author of Give Me a Break: How I Exposed Hucksters, Cheats, and Scam Artists and Became the Scourge of the Liberal Media (January 2005) as well as Myth, Lies, and Downright Stupidity: Get Out the
Shovel — Why Everything You Know Is Wrong (May 2007), which is now available in paperback.