The Audacity of Rhetoric
Opinion Editorial by Thomas Sowell -
Mar 25, 2008
55 ratings from readers
Should Barack Obama be held responsible for the friends he keeps? Only
if we want to understand what sort of politician we are being offered,
and what our reaction should be.
It is painful to watch
defenders of Barack Obama tying themselves into knots trying to evade the
obvious.
Some are saying that Senator
Obama cannot be held responsible for what his pastor, Jeremiah Wright, said. In
their version of events, Barack Obama just happened to be in the wrong place at
the wrong time — and a bunch of mean-spirited people are trying to make
something out of it.
It makes a good story, but it
won’t stand up under scrutiny.
Barack Obama’s own account of
his life shows that he consciously sought out people on the far left fringe. In
college, “I chose my friends carefully,” he said in his first book, “Dreams
From My Father.”
These friends included “Marxist
professors and structural feminists and punk rock performance poets” — in Obama’s
own words — as well as the “more politically active black students.” He later
visited a former member of the terrorist Weatherman underground, who endorsed
him when he ran for state senator.
Obama didn’t just happen to
encounter Jeremiah Wright, who just happened to say some way out things. Jeremiah
Wright is in the same mold as the kinds of people Barack Obama began seeking
out in college — members of the left, anti-American counter-culture.
In Shelby Steele’s brilliantly
insightful book about Barack Obama — “A Bound Man” — it is painfully clear that
Obama was one of those people seeking a racial identity that he had never
really experienced in growing up in a white world. He was trying to become a
convert to blackness, as it were — and, like many converts, he went overboard.
Nor has Obama changed in recent
years. His voting record in the U.S. Senate is the furthest left of any
Senator. There is a remarkable consistency in what Barack Obama has done over
the years, despite inconsistencies in what he says.
The irony is that Obama’s
sudden rise politically to the level of being the leading contender for his
party’s presidential nomination has required him to project an entirely
different persona, that of a post-racial leader who can heal divisiveness and
bring us all together.
The ease with which he has
accomplished this chameleon-like change, and entranced both white and black
Democrats, is a tribute to the man’s talent and a warning about his
reliability.
There is no evidence that Obama
ever sought to educate himself on the views of people on the other end of the
political spectrum, much less reach out to them. He reached out from the left
to the far left. That’s bringing us all together?
Is “divisiveness” defined as disagreeing
with the agenda of the left? Who on the left was ever called divisive by Obama
before that became politically necessary in order to respond to revelations
about Jeremiah Wright?
One sign of Obama’s verbal
virtuosity was his equating a passing comment by his grandmother — “a typical
white person,” he says — with an organized campaign of public vilification of
America in general and white America in particular, by Jeremiah Wright.
Since all things are the same,
except for the differences, and different except for the similarities, it is
always possible to make things look similar verbally, however different they
are in the real world.
Among the many desperate
gambits by defenders of Senator Obama and Jeremiah Wright is to say that Wright’s
words have a “resonance” in the black community.
There was a time when the Ku
Klux Klan’s words had a resonance among whites, not only in the South but in
other states. Some people joined the KKK in order to advance their political
careers. Did that make it OK? Is it all just a matter of whose ox is gored?
While many whites may be
annoyed by Jeremiah Wright’s words, a year from now most of them will probably
have forgotten about him. But many blacks who absorb his toxic message can
still be paying for it, big-time, for decades to come.
Why should young blacks be expected to work to meet
educational standards, or even behavioral standards, if they believe the
message that all their problems are caused by whites, that the deck is stacked
against them? That is ultimately a message of hopelessness, however much
audacity it may have.
Thomas Sowell is a Senior Fellow at The Hoover Institution at Stanford University in California. He has published dozens of books on economics, education, race, and other topics. His most recent book is Economic Facts and Fallacies, published in December 2007.