False Solutions and Real Problems
Opinion Editorial by Thomas Sowell -
Apr 1, 2009
42 ratings from readers
"If it ain't broken, don't mend it." Our politicians seem oblivious to this wise rule. Why else would they keep offering solutions to problems that don't exist — and ignoring the ones that do?
Someone once said
that Senator Hubert Humphrey, liberal icon of an earlier generation,
had more solutions than there were problems.
Senator Humphrey
was not unique in that respect. In fact, our present economic crisis
has developed out of politicians providing solutions to problems that
did not exist — and, as a result, producing a problem whose
existence is all too real and all too painful.
What was the
problem that didn’t exist? It was a national problem of
unaffordable housing. The political crusade for affordable housing
got into high gear in the 1990s and led to all kinds of changes in
mortgage lending practices, which in turn led to a housing boom and
bust that has left us in the mess we are now trying to dig out of.
Usually housing
affordability is measured in terms of how much of the average
person’s income it takes to cover either apartment rent or a
monthly mortgage payment.
There were
certainly places here and there where it took half a family’s
income just to put a roof over their heads. Many such places were in
coastal California but there were a few others, here and there, on
the east coast and elsewhere.
But, vast areas
of the country in between — “flyover country” to the east coast
and west coast elites — had housing prices that took no larger
share of the average American’s income than in the decade before
the affordable housing crusade got under way.
Why then a
national crusade by Washington politicians over local problems?
Probably as good an answer as any is that “It seemed like a good
idea at the time.” How are we to be kept aware of how compassionate
and how important our elected officials are unless they are busy
solving some problem for us?
The problem of
skyrocketing housing prices was all too real in those places where
this problem existed. When you have to live on half your income
because the other half goes for housing, that’s a real downer.
Almost
invariably, these severe local problems had local causes — usually
severe local restrictions on building homes. These restrictions had a
variety of politically attractive names, ranging from “open space”
laws and “smart growth” policies to “environmental protection”
and “farmland preservation.”
Like most
wonderful-sounding political slogans, none of these lofty goals was
discussed in terms of that one four-letter word that people do not
use in polite political society — “cost.”
No one asked how
many hundreds of thousands of dollars would be added to the cost of
an average home by “open space” laws, for example. Yet empirical
studies have shown that land-use restrictions added at least a
hundred thousand dollars to the average home price in dozens of
places around the country.
In some places,
such as coastal California, these restrictions added several hundred
thousand dollars to the price of the average home.
In other words,
where the problem was real, local politicians were the cause.
National politicians then tried to depict this as a national problem
that they would solve.
How would they
solve it? By pressuring banks and other lenders to lower their
requirements for making mortgage loans, so that more people could buy
houses. The Department of Housing and Urban Development gave the
government-sponsored enterprise Fannie Mae quotas for how many
mortgages it should buy that were made out for people for low to
moderate incomes.
Like most
political “solutions,” the solution to the affordable housing
“problem” took little or no account of the wider repercussions
this would entail.
Various
economists and others warned repeatedly that lowered lending
standards meant more risky mortgages. Given the complex relationships
among banks and other financial institutions, including many big Wall
Street firms, if mortgages started defaulting, all the financial
dominoes could start falling.
These warnings
were brushed aside. Politicians were too busy solving a national
problem that didn’t exist. In the process, they created very real
problems. Now they are now offering even more solutions that will
undoubtedly lead to even bigger problems.
Thomas Sowell is a Senior Fellow at The Hoover Institution at Stanford University in California. He has published dozens of books on economics, education, race, and other topics. His most recent book is Economic Facts and Fallacies, published in December 2007.