November 3 Contract with America

While many voters express disgust with runaway government spending, this feeling rarely extends to the most costly entitlement programs that threaten to bankrupt the United States. Why?
Larry-elder

On Nov. 2, 2010, the Republican Party recaptured the majority in the House. In the Senate, Republicans now possess numbers sufficient to sustain a filibuster and stop objectionable legislation from getting to the floor.
       
Obamalism has now been arrested. Voters rose to say no to the two-year gusher of spending and the staggering increases in the annual deficit and the national debt. Under Obama and the Democratic congressional majority, the national debt, as a percentage of GDP, jumped from 69 percent to a projected 94 percent. Voters said, "Enough!"
       
Now what?
       
"Governing isn't as easy as you think," said retiring Rep. Brian Baird, D-Wash. "Many of you have taken pledges that are contradictory. ... You must be honest about the numbers, since our annual deficit now exceeds all discretionary spending combined. If you set as your goal to roll back the size of government, you have an obligation to answer the tough questions and show real courage, not just appeal to ideology. Treat the voters like adults."
       
Politicians take contradictory pledges because voters send contradictory signals. Voters oppose tax hikes, even on the so-called rich. They agree that government is too large and understand that the three major drivers of domestic spending — Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid — grow on automatic pilot and saddle future generations with trillions of dollars in unfunded liability.
       
But voters, especially older ones, still want to spare this or that program or entitlement from the scalpel. Voters dislike ObamaCare. But a majority finds it perfectly acceptable to mandate that insurance companies take on those with pre-existing illnesses. This, of course, stands the concept of "insurance" on its head by forcing companies to assume known risks rather than just unknown ones.
       
We need a November 3 Contract with America.
       
This Contract acknowledges that the Founding Fathers designed the Constitution as a contract that limits the size and scope of the federal government, not as a "living, breathing document" that supports whatever desires voters want and politicians grant.

It challenges voters to face up to the train wreck of entitlement programs, annual deficit, national debt and interest payments on the debt. The Contract reduces government's size and scope so that we never again jeopardize our prosperity — which threatens our national security by robbing Americans of the resources necessary to defend ourselves against our enemies.
       
The November 3 Contract with America addresses these issues without raising taxes or cutting benefits for those currently receiving them or who will soon be eligible for them.
       
I. Sell or lease land. The federal government owns about 700 million acres, more than one-fourth of all land in the U.S. For fiscal year 2007, the government valued its land holdings only at about $1 trillion — but that includes a zero-dollar valuation for much of the acreage because it was never "purchased." The national debt is approximately $14 trillion. The proceeds from sales/mortgages/leases will fund our current and near-term liabilities and, with other changes, will completely eliminate our debt.
       
II. Social Security. Workers below the age of 55 shall have the option of placing their retirement contributions in private savings accounts.
       
III. Medicare. Health care needs of those below the age of 55 shall be addressed with individual, tax-free health savings accounts. From these accounts, people can purchase policies with high deductibles, as we do with auto insurance. Non-emergency matters will be paid for out-of-pocket from the accounts.
       
IV. Medicaid. Those currently on Medicaid must be grandfathered in, but by a date certain, all federal welfare payments will stop. The needs of the needy will be handled by the states and/or by the unparalleled generosity of the American people.
       
V. Eliminate, privatize, outsource or sell/lease many federal activities. These include, but are not limited to, Amtrak; the Tennessee Valley Authority; government-operated dams and nuclear power plants; the federal student aid grants and loans; public housing; the Food and Drug Administration; the Occupational Safety and Health Administration; the departments of Energy, Education, and Housing and Urban Development; the Environmental Protection Agency; Freddie Mac; Fannie Mae; the National Institutes of Health; and the Federal Housing Administration.
       
VI. Repeal laws that violate the principle of federalism, such as wage and hour laws; federal minimum wage; the Clean Air Act; the Americans with Disabilities Act; equal pay laws; the Davis-Bacon Act (mandating prevailing union wages for those working under federal contracts); and all federal anti-discrimination laws that apply to the private sector.
       
VII. Taxes. Eliminate income, corporate, capital gains, dividend and estate taxes. Given the reduced size of government, the limited duties of the federal government as described in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution will be funded, as the Founding Fathers envisioned, with duties and tariffs.
       
Conclusion:
       
The Contract extricates the taxpayers from this unsustainable burden of spending and mortgaging our future. To do so without drastically reducing the size of government is like burning the living room furniture to keep warm. There is no "solution," only trade-offs.
       
Let's begin the conversation, and let it lead to action.



Larry Elder is a syndicated radio talk show host and best-selling author. His latest book, "What's Race Got to Do with It?" is available now. To find out more about Larry Elder, visit his Web page at www.WeveGotACountryToSave.com.


5 comments from readers  

To post comments, please log in first. The Atlasphere is a social networking site for admirers of Ayn Rand's novels, most notably The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged. In addition to our online magazine, we offer a member directory and a dating service. If you share our enjoyment of Ayn Rand's novels, please sign up or log in to post comments.
Photo-not-provided
Excellent on all counts! I appreciate reading your work and agree fully with your constitutional stance, but I feel that our objective will only be met when more Tea Partier's have a solid philosophy to support their ideas that they hold so dear, but do not understand, "Why!"

Everyday more and more are reading the works of Ayn Rand and a few are actually studying her philosophy. The numbers are growing and as history has proven, it only takes a few to have a huge impact on both the civilized and uncivilized world. Keep up the wonderful work!
Roger B
0 points
Photo-not-provided
Excellent! Let's hold these newly elected representatives to their mission. There may never be another chance like this one to start to undo almost a century of creeping socialism and gargantuan gains in the size of government!
(profile not found)
0 points
Photo-not-provided
All great suggestions.

If only! There is too much momentum behind these programs to knock them out cold.

The best cut-back suggestion I can offer is a Constitutional Amendment calling for the sunsetting of all laws after twenty years unless expressly re-authorized by a supermajority of Congress. That would give CongressCritters something to do without adding new laws to the books, plus they would have the benefit of 20-20 hindsight when considering whether an existing law is worth keeping on the books-- especially those laws which created the entities with out-of-control spending.
Photo-not-provided
Good sense: As a Social Security beneficiary I am appalled at who besides retirees receive SS. I do believe that needs to be addressed. As for Medicare or any other insurance for that matter I truly believe that ALL folks need to take responsibility for their health. We are ALL guilty of not taking enough interest in just what entitlement programs are out there. We all need to "pull up our bootstraps" and live within our means. Thanks for the article.
Small
Why impose the government mandate on those over 55?

The ideal would be to allow ALL SS/MediCare participants to simply withdraw all of the money they've contributed to those monopoly systems into a fully vested ("owned") 401K or FMSA.

Anyone of any age should be able to opt-out of those programs. Those who want to stay in them should be obliged to sign a contract recognizing that Congress can reduce their benefits at any time. Private accounts should be fully inheritable.

The key here is to make it a CHOICE, not a mandate.
To post comments, please log in first. The Atlasphere is a social networking site for admirers of Ayn Rand's novels, most notably The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged. In addition to our online magazine, we offer a member directory and a dating service. If you share our enjoyment of Ayn Rand's novels, please sign up or log in to post comments.